nach oben

Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology

17.05.2024 | Cataract

Accuracy of 14 intraocular lens power calculation formulas in extremely long eyes

verfasst von: Xinxin Li, Chunyuan Song, Yong Wang, Jing Wang, Qiongyan Tang, Zheming Wu, Yanwen Zhou, Juan Sun, Yanhong Jia, Zhenlin Lin, Shaowei Li

Erschienen in: Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

To compare the accuracy of 14 formulas in calculating intraocular lens (IOL) power in extremely long eyes with axial length (AL) over 30.0 mm.

Methods

In this retrospective study, 211 eyes (211 patients) with ALs > 30.0 mm were successfully treated with cataract surgery without complications. Ocular biometric parameters were obtained from IOLMaster 700. Fourteen formulas were evaluated using the optimized A constants: Barrett Universal II (BUII), Kane, Emmetropia Verifying Optical (EVO) 2.0, PEARL-DGS, T2, SRK/T, Holladay 1, Holladay 2, Haigis and Wang-Koch AL adjusted formulas (SRK/T_modified-W/K, Holladay 1_modified-W/K, Holladay 1_{NP-modified-W/K}, Holladay 2_modified-W/K, Holladay 2_{NP-modified-W/K}). The mean prediction error (PE) and standard deviation (SD), mean absolute errors (MAE), median absolute errors (MedAE), and the percentage of prediction errors (PEs) within ± 0.25 D, ± 0.50 D, ± 1.00 D were analyzed.

Results

The Kane formula had the smallest MAE (0.43 D) and MedAE (0.34 D). The highest percentage of PE within ± 0.25 D was for EVO 2.0 (37.91%) and the Holladay 1_{NP-modified-W/K} formulas (37.91%). The Kane formula had the highest percentage of PEs in the range of ± 0.50, ± 0.75, ± 1.00, and ± 2.00 D. There was no significant difference in PEs within ± 0.25, ± 0.50 ± 0.75 and ± 1.00 D between BUII, Kane, EVO 2.0 and Wang-Koch AL adjusted formulas (P > .05) by using Cochran’s Q test. The Holladay 2_modified-W/K formula has the lowest percentage of hyperopic outcomes (29.38%).

Conclusions

The BUII, Kane, EVO 2.0 and Wang-Koch AL adjusted formulas have comparable accuracy for IOL power calculation in eyes with ALs > 30.0 mm.

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Holden BA, Fricke TR, Wilson DA, Jong M, Naidoo KS, Sankaridurg P, Wong TY, Naduvilath TJ, Resnikoff S (2016) Global Prevalence of Myopia and High Myopia and Temporal Trends from 2000 through 2050. Ophthalmology 123:1036–1042. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.01.006CrossRefPubMed

Dong L, Kang YK, Li Y, Wei WB, Jonas JB (2020) Prevalence and time trends of myopia in children and adolescents in china: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis. Retina 40:399–411. https://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0000000000002590CrossRefPubMed

Pan CW, Boey PY, Cheng CY, Saw SM, Tay WT, Wang JJ, Tan AG, Mitchell P, Wong TY (2013) Myopia, Axial Length, and Age-Related Cataract: The Singapore Malay Eye Study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 54:4498–4502. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.13-12271CrossRefPubMed

Xu J, Mo Y (2023) Mendelian randomization study confirms causal relationship between myopia and vitreous disorders. BMC Med Genomics 16:238. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12920-023-01673-xCrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Igarashi-Yokoi T, Shinohara K, Fang Y, Ogata S, Yoshida T, Imanaka T, Yoshida H, Shibagaki K, Inoue H, Toshimori M, Togashi Y, Ohno-Matsui K (2021) Prognostic Factors for Axial Length Elongation and Posterior Staphyloma in Adults With High Myopia: A Japanese Observational Study. Am J Ophthalmol 225:76–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2020.11.023CrossRefPubMed

Haarman AEG, Enthoven CA, Tideman JWL, Tedja MS, Verhoeven VJM, Klaver CCW (2020) The complications of myopia: a review and meta-analysis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 61:49. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.61.4.49

Kanthan GL, Mitchell P, Rochtchina E, Cumming RG, Wang JJ (2013) Myopia and the long-term incidence of cataract and cataract surgery: the Blue Mountains Eye Study. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 42:347–353. https://doi.org/10.1111/ceo.12206CrossRefPubMed

Zhu X, Li D, Du Y, He W, Lu Y (2018) DNA hypermethylation-mediated downregulation of antioxidant genes contributes to the early onset of cataracts in highly myopic eyes. Redox Biol 19:179–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.redox.2018.08.012CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Melles RB, Holladay JT, Chang WJ (2018) Accuracy of Intraocular Lens Calculation Formulas. Ophthalmology 125:169–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.08.027CrossRefPubMed

10.

Savini G, Di Maita M, Hoffer KJ, Naeser K, Schiano-Lomoriello D, Vagge A, Di Cello L, Traverso CE (2021) Comparison of 13 formulas for IOL power calculation with measurements from partial coherence interferometry. Br J Ophthalmol 105:484–489. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2020-316193CrossRefPubMed

11.

Carmona-Gonzalez D, Castillo-Gomez A, Palomino-Bautista C, Romero-Dominguez M, Gutierrez-Moreno MA (2021) Comparison of the accuracy of 11 intraocular lens power calculation formulas. Eur J Ophthalmol 31:2370–2376. https://doi.org/10.1177/1120672120962030CrossRefPubMed

12.

Guo C, Yin S, Qiu K, Zhang M (2022) Comparison of accuracy of intraocular lens power calculation for eyes with an axial length greater than 29.0 mm. Int Ophthalmol 42:2029–2038. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-021-02194-1CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

13.

Lin L, Xu M, Mo E, Huang S, Qi X, Gu S, Sun W, Su Q, Li J, Zhao YE (2021) Accuracy of Newer Generation IOL Power Calculation Formulas in Eyes With High Axial Myopia. J Refract Surg 37:754–758. https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20210712-08CrossRefPubMed

14.

Rong X, He W, Zhu Q, Qian D, Lu Y, Zhu X (2019) Intraocular lens power calculation in eyes with extreme myopia: Comparison of Barrett Universal II, Haigis, and Olsen formulas. J Cataract Refract Surg 45:732–737. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2018.12.025CrossRefPubMed

15.

Wang L, Shirayama M, Ma XJ, Kohnen T, Koch DD (2011) Optimizing intraocular lens power calculations in eyes with axial lengths above 25.0 mm. J Cataract Refract Surg 37:2018–2027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2011.05.042CrossRefPubMed

16.

Cooke DL, Cooke TL (2019) Approximating sum-of-segments axial length from a traditional optical low-coherence reflectometry measurement. J Cataract Refract Surg 45:351–354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2018.12.026CrossRefPubMed

17.

Wang Q, Jiang W, Lin T, Zhu Y, Chen C, Lin H, Chen W (2018) Accuracy of intraocular lens power calculation formulas in long eyes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 46:738–749. https://doi.org/10.1111/ceo.13184CrossRefPubMed

18.

Voytsekhivskyy O, Tutchenko L (2023) Comparison of the prediction accuracy of 13 formulas in long eyes. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 261:2575–2583. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-023-06060-xCrossRefPubMed

19.

Ma Y, Xiong R, Liu Z, Young CA, Wu Y, Zheng D, Zhang X, Jin G (2024) Network Meta-analysis of Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Formula Accuracy in 1016 Eyes With Long Axial Length. Am J Ophthalmol 257:178–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2023.09.009CrossRefPubMed

20.

Mo E, Feng K, Li Q, Xu J, Cen J, Li J, Zhao YE (2023) Efficacy of corneal curvature on the accuracy of 8 intraocular lens power calculation formulas in 302 highly myopic eyes. J Cataract Refract Surg 49:1195–1200. https://doi.org/10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001303CrossRefPubMed

21.

Mo E, Chen Z, Feng K, Yang F, Li J, Zhao YE (2023) Accuracy of Seven Modern Online IOL Formulas in Eyes With Axial Lengths Longer Than 30 mm. J Refract Surg 39:705–710. https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597x-20230831-03CrossRefPubMed

22.

Tan Q, Lin D, Wang L, Chen B, Tang Q, Chen X, Chen M, Tan J, Zhang J, Wu L, Zhu X, Wang Y (2021) Comparison of IOL Power Calculation Formulas for a Trifocal IOL in Eyes With High Myopia. J Refract Surg 37:538–544. https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20210506-01CrossRefPubMed

23.

Barrett GD (1993) An improved universal theoretical formula for intraocular lens power prediction. J Cataract Refract Surg 19:713–720. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0886-3350(13)80339-2CrossRefPubMed

24.

Connell BJ, Kane JX (2019) Comparison of the Kane formula with existing formulas for intraocular lens power selection. BMJ Open Ophthalmol 4:e000251. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2018-000251

25.

Debellemanière G, Dubois M, Gauvin M, Wallerstein A, Brenner LF, Rampat R, Saad A, Gatinel D (2021) The PEARL-DGS Formula: The Development of an Open-source Machine Learning–based Thick IOL Calculation Formula. Am J Ophthalmol 232:58–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2021.05.004CrossRefPubMed

26.

Sheard RM, Smith GT, Cooke DL (2010) Improving the prediction accuracy of the SRK/T formula: The T2 formula. J Cataract Refract Surg 36:1829–1834. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.05.031CrossRefPubMed

27.

Retzlaff JA, Sanders DR, Kraff MC (1990) Development of the SRK/T intraocular lens implant power calculation formula. J Cataract Refract Surg 16:333–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0886-3350(13)80705-5CrossRefPubMed

28.

Holladay JT, Prager TC, Chandler TY, Musgrove KH, Lewis JW, Ruiz RS (1988) A three-part system for refining intraocular lens power calculations. J Cataract Refract Surg 14:17–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0886-3350(88)80059-2CrossRefPubMed

29.

Haigis W, Lege B, Miller N, Schneider B (2000) Comparison of immersion ultrasound biometry and partial coherence interferometry for intraocular lens calculation according to Haigis. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 238:765–773. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004170000188CrossRefPubMed

30.

Wang L, Koch DD (2018) Modified axial length adjustment formulas in long eyes. J Cataract Refract Surg 44:1396–1397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2018.07.049CrossRefPubMed

31.

Wang L, Holladay JT, Koch DD (2018) Wang-Koch axial length adjustment for the Holladay 2 formula in long eyes. J Cataract Refract Surg 44:1291–1292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2018.06.057CrossRefPubMed

32.

(2019) Erratum. J Cataract Refract Surg 45:117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2018.12.009

33.

Yang JY, Kim HK, Kim SS (2017) Axial length measurements: Comparison of a new swept-source optical coherence tomography–based biometer and partial coherence interferometry in myopia. J Cataract Refract Surg 43:328–332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2016.12.023CrossRefPubMed

34.

Akman A, Asena L, Güngör SG (2016) Evaluation and comparison of the new swept source OCT-based IOLMaster 700 with the IOLMaster 500. Br J Ophthalmol 100:1201–1205. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2015-307779CrossRefPubMed

35.

Calvo-Sanz JA, Portero-Benito A, Arias-Puente A (2018) Efficiency and measurements agreement between swept-source OCT and low-coherence interferometry biometry systems. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 256:559–566. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-018-3909-9CrossRefPubMed

36.

Kane JX, Chang DF (2021) Intraocular Lens Power Formulas, Biometry, and Intraoperative Aberrometry: A Review. Ophthalmology 128:e94–e114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2020.08.010CrossRefPubMed

37.

Hoffer KJ, Savini G (2017) IOL Power calculation in short and long eyes. Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila) 6:330–331. https://doi.org/10.22608/APO.2017338

38.

Li C, Wang M, Feng R, Liang F, Liu X, He C, Fan S (2022) Comparison of Formula-Specific Factors and Artificial Intelligence Formulas with Axial Length Adjustments in Bilateral Cataract Patients with Long Axial Length. Ophthalmol Ther 11:1869–1881. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40123-022-00551-6CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

39.

Idrobo-Robalino CA, Santaella G, Gutiérrez ÁM (2019) T2 formula in a highly myopic population, comparison with other methods and description of an improved approach for estimating corneal height. BMC Ophthalmol 19:222. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-019-1226-7CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

40.

Liu J, Wang L, Chai F, Han Y, Qian S, Koch DD, Weikert MP (2019) Comparison of intraocular lens power calculation formulas in Chinese eyes with axial myopia. J Cataract Refract Surg 45:725–731. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2019.01.018CrossRefPubMed

41.

Bernardes J, Raimundo M, Lobo C, Murta JN (2021) A Comparison of Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Formulas in High Myopia. J Refract Surg 37:207–211. https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20201123-01CrossRefPubMed

42.

Abulafia A, Barrett GD, Rotenberg M, Kleinmann G, Levy A, Reitblat O, Koch DD, Wang L, Assia EI (2015) Intraocular lens power calculation for eyes with an axial length greater than 26.0 mm: comparison of formulas and methods. J Cataract Refract Surg 41:548–556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2014.06.033CrossRefPubMed

Titel: Accuracy of 14 intraocular lens power calculation formulas in extremely long eyes
verfasst von: Xinxin Li
Chunyuan Song
Yong Wang
Jing Wang
Qiongyan Tang
Zheming Wu
Yanwen Zhou
Juan Sun
Yanhong Jia
Zhenlin Lin
Shaowei Li
Publikationsdatum: 17.05.2024
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology
Print ISSN: 0721-832X
Elektronische ISSN: 1435-702X
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-024-06506-w

Neu im Fachgebiet Augenheilkunde

Metastase in der periokulären Region

Metastasen Leitthema

Orbitale und periokuläre metastatische Tumoren galten früher als sehr selten. Aber mit der ständigen Aktualisierung von Medikamenten und Nachweismethoden für die Krebsbehandlung werden neue Chemotherapien und Strahlenbehandlungen eingesetzt. Die …

Staging und Systemtherapie bei okulären und periokulären Metastasen

Metastasen Leitthema

Metastasen bösartiger Erkrankungen sind die häufigsten Tumoren, die im Auge diagnostiziert werden. Sie treten bei ungefähr 5–10 % der Patienten mit soliden Tumoren im Verlauf der Erkrankung auf. Besonders häufig sind diese beim Mammakarzinom und …

CME: Wundheilung nach Trabekulektomie

Trabekulektomie CME-Artikel

Wird ein Glaukom chirurgisch behandelt, ist die anschließende Wundheilung von entscheidender Bedeutung. In diesem CME-Kurs lernen Sie, welche Pathomechanismen der Vernarbung zugrunde liegen, wie perioperativ therapiert und Operationsversagen frühzeitig erkannt werden kann.

„standard operating procedures“ (SOP) – Vorschlag zum therapeutischen Management bei periokulären sowie intraokulären Metastasen

Metastasen Leitthema

Peri- sowie intraokuläre Metastasen sind insgesamt gesehen selten und meist Zeichen einer fortgeschrittenen primären Tumorerkrankung. Die Therapie ist daher zumeist palliativ und selten kurativ. Zudem ist die Therapiefindung sehr individuell. Die …

Update Augenheilkunde

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Live-Webinar "Urologie und Sexualmedizin in der Praxis"

Springer Medizin

Accuracy of 14 intraocular lens power calculation formulas in extremely long eyes

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Neu im Fachgebiet Augenheilkunde

Metastase in der periokulären Region

Staging und Systemtherapie bei okulären und periokulären Metastasen

CME: Wundheilung nach Trabekulektomie

„standard operating procedures“ (SOP) – Vorschlag zum therapeutischen Management bei periokulären sowie intraokulären Metastasen

Update Augenheilkunde

Live-Webinar "Urologie und Sexualmedizin in der Praxis"

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Neu im Fachgebiet Augenheilkunde

Metastase in der periokulären Region

Staging und Systemtherapie bei okulären und periokulären Metastasen

CME: Wundheilung nach Trabekulektomie

„standard operating procedures“ (SOP) – Vorschlag zum therapeutischen Management bei periokulären sowie intraokulären Metastasen

Update Augenheilkunde