Erschienen in:
11.09.2023 | Original Article
Clinician feedback using a shared decision-making tool for the evaluation of patients with thyroid nodules—an observational study
verfasst von:
Naykky Singh Ospina, Chandani Patel Chavez, Eddison Godinez Leiva, Diliara Bagautdinova, Jessica Hidalgo, Sandra Hartasanchez, Sandra Algarin Perneth, Diana Barb, Deepa Danan, Peter Dziegielewski, Brian Hughley, Ashok Srihari, Sreevidya Subbarayan, M. Regina Castro, Diana Dean, John Morris, Mabel Ryder, Marius N. Stan, Ian Hargraves, Carma L. Bylund, Debbie Treise, Victor M. Montori, Juan P. Brito
Erschienen in:
Endocrine
|
Ausgabe 2/2024
Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten
Abstract
Background
We pilot-tested an encounter conversation aid to support shared decision making (SDM) between patients with thyroid nodules and their clinicians.
Objective
Characterize the clinician feedback after providing care to patients with thyroid nodules using a tool to promote SDM conversations during the clinical encounter, and evaluate how clinicians used the tool during the visit.
Methods
Mixed method study in two academic centers in the U.S., including adult patients presenting for evaluation of thyroid nodules and their clinicians. We thematically analyzed interviews with clinicians after they used the SDM tool in at least three visits to characterize their feedback. Additionally, investigators evaluated visits recordings to determine the extent to which clinicians engaged patients in the decision-making process (OPTION score, scale 0 to 100, higher levels indicating higher involvement), the tool’s components used (fidelity), and encounter duration. Using a post-visit survey, we evaluated the extent to which clinicians felt the tool was easy to use, helpful, and supportive of the patient-clinician collaboration.
Results
Thirteen clinicians participated in the study and used the SDM tool in the care of 53 patients. Clinicians thought the tool was well-organized and beneficial to patients and clinicians. Clinicians noticed a change in their routine with the use of the conversation aid and suggested it needed to be more flexible to better support varying conversations. The median OPTION score was 34, the fidelity of use 75%, and the median visit duration 17 min. In most encounters, clinicians agreed or strongly agreed the tool was easy to use (86%), helpful (65%), and supported collaboration (62%).
Conclusion
Clinicians were able to use a SDM tool in the care of patients with thyroid nodules. Although they wished it were more flexible, they found on the whole that its use in the clinical encounter was beneficial to patients and clinicians.