nach oben

European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry

Erschienen in:

01.11.2022 | Systematic Review

Comparative in vitro evaluation of remaining dentine thickness following instrumentation with hand and rotary endodontic files during pulpectomy in primary molars: a systematic review

verfasst von: P. Nisar, F. Katge, P. Bhanushali, S. Deshpande, M. Poojari, S. Shetty

Erschienen in: European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry | Ausgabe 1/2023

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

The aim was to compare the remaining dentine thickness (RDT) following instrumentation with hand and rotary endodontic files during pulpectomy in primary molars. Research question was ‘Is there any difference between the remaining dentine thickness following instrumentation with hand and rotary endodontic files during pulpectomy in primary molars?’.

Methods

Electronic Databases like MEDLINE PubMed, Cochrane Library, EBSCOhost, Google scholar and grey literature were searched between January 1, 2006 and August 31, 2022 for in vitro and ex vivo studies that compared hand and rotary endodontic instrumentation to evaluate the RDT in primary molars. Articles published in English or which could be translated into English were searched. Two reviewers independently selected studies, extracted data, assessed risk of bias using the Revised, validated version of MINORS criteria.

Results

Twelve studies were included in qualitative analysis. All included studies showed low risk of bias. Six studies showed more RDT with rotary instrumentation compared to manual instrumentation. Whereas, five studies showed variable results for RDT with manual and rotary instrumentation at different levels of root canals. One study showed no significant difference between manual and rotary instrumentation. In view of methodological heterogeneity of the findings, a meta-analysis was not conducted.

Conclusion

High quality of evidence based on low risk of bias was found in all the included studies. Statistically, rotary instrumentation showed more RDT than manual instrumentation according to majority of studies. Despite the shortcomings of this systematic review, it is possible to infer that the use of rotary instrumentation provides more RDT and thus there is considerable conservation of tooth structure.

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Abd El fatah YAM, Khattab NMA, Gomaa YF, et al. Cone-beam computed tomography analysis of primary root canals transportation and dentine loss after instrumentation with two-pediatric rotary files. BMC Oral Health. 2022;22(1):1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-022-02245-8.CrossRef

Ahmed HM. Anatomical challenges, electronic working length determination and current developments in root canal preparation of primary molar teeth. Int Endod J. 2013;46(11):1011–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12134.CrossRefPubMed

Barasuol JC, Alcalde MP, Bortoluzzi EA, et al. Shaping ability of hand, rotary and reciprocating files in primary teeth: a micro-CT study in vitro. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2021;22(2):195–201. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40368-020-00530-0.CrossRefPubMed

Canoglu H, Tekcicek MU, Cehreli ZC. Comparison of conventional, rotary, and ultrasonic preparation, different final irrigation regimens, and 2 sealers in primary molar root canal therapy. Pediatr Dent. 2006;28(6):518–23.PubMed

Eldemery NA, Elshehawy O, Nasr RA, et al. Evaluation of remaining dentine thickness after manual and rotary instrumentation in primary molars using cone beam computed tomography. (An in-vitro study). Future Dent J. 2021;7(2):95–8. https://doi.org/10.54623/fdj.7024

Esentürk G, Akkas E, Cubukcu E, et al. A micro-computed tomographic assessment of root canal preparation with conventional and different rotary files in primary teeth and young permanent teeth. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2020;30(2):202–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/ipd.12587.CrossRefPubMed

Faus-Llácer V, Pulido Ouardi D, Faus-Matoses I, et al. Comparative analysis of root canal dentine removal capacity of two NiTi endodontic reciprocating systems for the root canal treatment of primary molar teeth. An in vitro study. J Clin Med. 2022;11(2):338. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11020338.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Flores CB, Machado P, Montagner F, et al. A methodology to standardize the evaluation of root canal instrumentation using cone beam computed tomography. Braz J Oral Sci. 2012;11(2):84–7.

Fuks ABKA, Guelmann M. Pulp therapy for the primary dentition. In: Al C, editor. Pediatric dentistry infancy through adolescence. St Louis: Elsevier Saunders; 2013. pp. 333–51.

Ghahramani Y, Mohammadi N, Zangooei-Booshehri M, et al. Comparing the amount of removed dentine thickness in root canal treated primary molar teeth using different instrumentation techniques: in-vitro study using CBCT. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2022;23(2):255–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40368-021-00662-x.CrossRefPubMed

Haridas H, Mohan A, Papisetti S, et al. Computed tomography: will the slices reveal the truth. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2016;6(2):S85-92. https://doi.org/10.4103/2231-0762.189734.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Harokopakis-Hajishengallis E. Physiological root resorption in primary teeth: molecular and histological events. J Oral Sci. 2007;49(1):1–12. https://doi.org/10.2334/josnusd.49.1.CrossRefPubMed

Huang TJ, Schilder H, Nathanson D. Effects of moisture content and endodontic treatment on some mechanical properties of human dentine. J Endod. 1992;18(5):209–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(06)81262-8.CrossRefPubMed

Jeevanandan G, Thomas E. Volumetric analysis of hand, reciprocating and rotary instrumentation techniques in primary molars using spiral computed tomography: an in vitro comparative study. Eur J Dent. 2018;12(01):021–6. https://doi.org/10.4103/ejd.ejd_247_17.CrossRef

Jhany NA, Hawaj BA, Hassan AA, et al. Comparison of the estimated radiographic remaining dentinee thickness with the actual thickness below the deep carious lesions on the posterior teeth: an in vitro study. Eur Endod J. 2019;4(3):139–44. https://doi.org/10.14744/eej.2019.53825.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Kandaswamy D, Venkateshbabu N, Porkodi I, et al. Canal-centering ability: an endodontic challenge. J Conserv Dent. 2009;12(1):3–9. https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.53334.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Kaya E, Elbay M, Yiğit D. Evaluation of the self-adjusting file system (SAF) for the instrumentation of primary molar root canals: a micro-computed tomographic study. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2017;18(2):105–10. https://doi.org/10.23804/ejpd.2017.18.02.04.CrossRefPubMed

Kiarudi AH, Eghbal MJ, Safi Y, et al. The applications of cone-beam computed tomography in endodontics: a review of literature. Iran Endod J. 2015;10(1):16–25. https://doi.org/10.22037/iej.v10i1.6383.CrossRefPubMed

Kummer TR, Calvo MC, Cordeiro MM, et al. Ex vivo study of manual and rotary instrumentation techniques in human primary teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2008;105(4):e84-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2007.12.008.CrossRefPubMed

Kunert GG, Camargo Fontanella VR, de Moura AA, et al. Analysis of apical root transportation associated with ProTaper Universal F3 and F4 instruments by using digital subtraction radiography. J Endod. 2010;36(6):1052–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2010.02.004.CrossRefPubMed

Lancaster PE, Craddock HL, Carmichael FA. Estimation of remaining dentinee thickness below deep lesions of caries. Br Dent J. 2011;211(10):E20. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2011.965.CrossRefPubMed

Lim SS, Stock CJ. The risk of perforation in the curved canal: anticurvature filing compared with the stepback technique. Int Endod J. 1987;20(1):33–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.1987.tb00586.x.CrossRefPubMed

Madan N, Rathnam A, Shigli AL, et al. K-file vs ProFiles in cleaning capacity and instrumentation time in primary molar root canals: an in vitro study. J Ind Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2011;29(1):2–6. https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-4388.79907.CrossRef

Manker A, Solanki M, Tripathi A, et al. Biomechanical preparation in primary molars using manual and three NiTi instruments: a cone-beam-computed tomographic in vitro study. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2020;21(2):203–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40368-019-00474-0.CrossRefPubMed

McDonald RE, Avery DR, Dean JA. Dentistry for the child and adolescent. 7th ed. St. Louis: CV Mosby Co; 2000.

Musale PK, Mujawar SA. Evaluation of the efficacy of rotary vs. hand files in root canal preparation of primary teeth in vitro using CBCT. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2014;15(2):113–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40368-013-0072-1.CrossRefPubMed

Musale PK, Jain KR, Kothare SS. Comparative assessment of dentine removal following hand and rotary instrumentation in primary molars using cone-beam computed tomography. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2019;37(1):80–6. https://doi.org/10.4103/JISPPD.JISPPD_210_18.CrossRefPubMed

O’Riordan MW, Coll J. Pulpectomy procedure for deciduous teeth with severe pulpal necrosis. J Am Dent Assoc. 1979;99(3):480–2. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1979.0310.CrossRefPubMed

Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Int J Surg. 2021;88: 105906. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n160.CrossRefPubMed

Parisay I, Ghoddusi J, Forghani M. A review on vital pulp therapy in primary teeth. Iran Endod J. 2015;10(1):6–15. https://doi.org/10.22037/iej.v10i1.6173.CrossRefPubMed

Prove SA, Symons AL, Meyers IA. Physiological root resorption of primary molars. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 1992;16(3):202–6.PubMed

Radhika E, Reddy ER, Rani ST, et al. Cone beam computed tomography evaluation of hand nickel-titanium K-files and rotary system in primary teeth. Pediatr Dent. 2017;39(4):319–23.PubMed

Seema T, Ahammed H, Parul S, et al. Comparative evaluation of dentine removal and taper of root canal preparation of hand K file, ProTaper rotary file, and kedo s rotary file in primary molars using cone-beam computed tomography. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2020;13(4):332–6. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1787.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Selvakumar H, Kavitha S, Thomas E, et al. Computed tomographic evaluation of K3 rotary and stainless-steel K file instrumentation in primary teeth. J Clin Diagnostic Res. 2016;10(1):ZC05-8. https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2016/14183.7028.CrossRef

Shahriari S, Abedi H, Hashemi M, et al. Comparison of removed dentine thickness with hand and rotary instruments. Iran Endod J. 2009;4(2):69–73. https://doi.org/10.22037/iej.v4i2.1352.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Shaikh SM, Goswami M. Evaluation of the effect of different root canal preparation techniques in primary teeth using CBCT. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2018;42(4):250–5. https://doi.org/10.17796/1053-4628-42.4.2.CrossRefPubMed

Sharma P, Kurthukoti AJ, Sebastian A, et al. Comparative evaluation of change in root canal shape and area in primary molars using ProTaper and K3 rotary systems: In vitro study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2021;39(4):392–7. https://doi.org/10.4103/jisppd.jisppd_30_21.CrossRefPubMed

Silva LA, Leonardo MR, Nelson-Filho P, et al. Comparison of rotary and manual instrumentation techniques on cleaning capacity and instrumentation time in deciduous molars. J Dent Child (chic). 2004;71(1):45–7.PubMed

Singh P, Saha S, Tripathi AM, et al. Cone-beam computed tomographic analysis of deciduous root canals after instrumentation with different filing systems: an in vitro study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2022;15(S1):S22–9. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2126.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Slim K, Nini E, Forestier D, et al. Methodological index for non-randomized studies (MINORS): development and validation of a new instrument. ANZ J Surg. 2003;73(9):712–6. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1445-2197.2003.02748.x.CrossRefPubMed

Swain MV, Xue J. State of the art of micro-CT applications in dental research. Int J Oral Sci. 2009;1(4):177–88. https://doi.org/10.4248/IJOS09031.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Tomer AK, Miglani A, Chauhan P, et al. An in-vitro evaluation of remaining dentinee thickness through Cbct using different files. IOSR J Dent Med Sci. 2017;16(2):121–4. https://doi.org/10.9790/0853-160201121124.CrossRef

Versümer J, Hülsmann M, Schäfers F. A comparative study of root canal preparation using ProFile 0.04 and lightspeed rotary Ni–Ti instruments. Int Endod J. 2002;35(1):37–46. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.2002.00454.x.CrossRefPubMed

Walton RE, Torabinejad M. Principles and practice of endodontics. 3rd Edition. Saunders Company; 2002. p. 222.

Waly A, et al. Comparison of two pediatric rotary file systems and hand instrumentation in primary molar: an ex vivo cone-beam computed tomographic study. Niger J Clin Pract. 2021;24(10):1492–8. https://doi.org/10.4103/njcp.njcp_563_20.CrossRefPubMed

Zameer M. Evaluation of radicular dentine remaining and risk of perforation after manual and rotary instrumentations in root canals of primary teeth: An in vitro study. J Pediatr Dent. 2016;4(3):57–65. https://doi.org/10.4103/2321-6646.194370.CrossRef

Titel: Comparative in vitro evaluation of remaining dentine thickness following instrumentation with hand and rotary endodontic files during pulpectomy in primary molars: a systematic review
verfasst von: P. Nisar
F. Katge
P. Bhanushali
S. Deshpande
M. Poojari
S. Shetty
Publikationsdatum: 01.11.2022
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry / Ausgabe 1/2023
Print ISSN: 1818-6300
Elektronische ISSN: 1996-9805
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40368-022-00760-4

Update Zahnmedizin

Bestellen Sie unseren kostenlosen Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.

Newsletter bestellen

Live-Webinar "Urologie und Sexualmedizin in der Praxis"

Springer Medizin

Comparative in vitro evaluation of remaining dentine thickness following instrumentation with hand and rotary endodontic files during pulpectomy in primary molars: a systematic review

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Neu im Fachgebiet Zahnmedizin

„Übersichtlicher Wegweiser“: Lauterbachs umstrittener Klinik-Atlas ist online

Klinikreform soll zehntausende Menschenleben retten

Darf man die Behandlung eines Neonazis ablehnen?

Ein Drittel der jungen Ärztinnen und Ärzte erwägt abzuwandern

Update Zahnmedizin

Live-Webinar "Urologie und Sexualmedizin in der Praxis"

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2023

Does the scientific literature provide sufficient information on incisors affected by molar incisor hypomineralisation?

Childhood dental caries experience in northern Spain: a cross-sectional study

Impact of Covid-19 pandemic on children with special needs requiring general anaesthesia for the treatment of dental disease: the experience of the Brescia Children’s Hospital, Lombardy, Italy

Oral health knowledge of Spanish breastfeeding mothers

Molar-incisor hypomineralisation prevalence in a cohort of Australian children with type 1 diabetes

In vitro evaluation of fissure sealants’ wear under erosive, abrasive and erosive/abrasive conditions

Neu im Fachgebiet Zahnmedizin

„Übersichtlicher Wegweiser“: Lauterbachs umstrittener Klinik-Atlas ist online

Klinikreform soll zehntausende Menschenleben retten

Darf man die Behandlung eines Neonazis ablehnen?

Ein Drittel der jungen Ärztinnen und Ärzte erwägt abzuwandern

Update Zahnmedizin