Introduction
Microvascular reconstruction of the head and neck region with free flaps offers functional and esthetic outcomes as well as high overall success rates [
1,
2]. However, the use of microvascular free flaps remains challenging due to transient flap failure with the need for flap revision and terminal flap failure with loss of the flap, which is associated with high patient burden and the need for additional surgeries or lasting functional and esthetic compromise [
1,
3,
4].
Microvascular free flap perfusion, as a prerequisite for flap viability, initially depends entirely on continuous arterial inflow and venous outflow through a patent microvascular anastomosis, and ischemia of the flap related to vascular compromise is associated with deleterious effects such as microthrombi formation, ultimately leading to irreversible microcirculation failure and subsequently flap failure [
5‐
9]. Given the inverse relationship of the time interval between the onset of vascular compromise and intervention and the flap salvage rate, postoperative flap monitoring for timely detection of vascular compromise is crucial [
8,
10,
11]. In this context, the most commonly performed method of clinical monitoring is based on flap color, surface temperature, capillary refill, and pricking tests; however, such monitoring is limited by several constraints, such as the need for clinical experience, lack of objective values, and delay between the onset of vascular compromise and the appearance of clinical changes [
8,
12,
13].
Therefore, the oxygen-2-see (O2C) analysis system (LEA Medizintechnik, Germany) was developed as an objective method for flap perfusion monitoring, and cut-off values indicative of vascular compromise have been established for unattached surface probes measuring flap perfusion at tissue depths of 2 mm and 8 mm [
7,
9]. However, attached surface probes measuring flap perfusion at a tissue depth of 3 mm to monitor flap perfusion with the O2C analysis system have potential advantages, such as constant probe pressure and consistent location of the measurement area, both of which may affect the measurements; moreover, attached surface probes have the potential to provide the basis for continuous monitoring [
14‐
16].
This study aimed to evaluate the use of attached surface probes for monitoring flap perfusion with the O2C analysis system in microvascular head and neck reconstruction for the detection of vascular compromise.
Discussion
This study evaluated postoperative flap perfusion monitoring with attached surface probes for the O2C analysis system in terms of determining cut-off values indicative of vascular compromise. Based on these cut-off values, sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and concordance with flap perfusion monitoring using standard unattached surface probes were assessed in terms of detecting vascular compromise [
7,
9].
Postoperative flap monitoring is considered crucial in microvascular free flap reconstruction of the head and neck region, as vascular compromise occurs, and timely detection and intervention are prerequisite for flap salvage [
8,
10,
11]. In this context, the O2C analysis system was developed as a reliable and objective method for flap monitoring based on flap perfusion measurement, as flap perfusion is a prerequisite for flap viability [
7‐
9,
20,
21]. Nonetheless, flap perfusion can be assessed with several other methods, including indocyanine green angiography with the disadvantages of invasiveness and the need for intravenous administration of agents, pin prick test with the disadvantages of invasiveness and subjective interpretation, and basic doppler assessment of vascular flow with the disadvantages of subjective interpretation and difficulty in distinguishing between arterial and venous compromise [
7‐
9]. The O2C analysis system is standardly used with unattached surface probes that measure flap perfusion at tissue depths of 2 mm and 8 mm, and the attendant cut-off values indicative of vascular compromise have been previously evaluated and approved [
7,
9]. However, attached surface probes that measure flap perfusion only at one tissue depth of 3 mm, but are smaller and lighter, could offer potential advantages for flap perfusion measurement, such as consistent probe pressure and location of the measurement area over the entire postoperative monitoring course — both of which are likely to influence flap perfusion measurement — and could provide the basis for continuous flap perfusion monitoring [
14‐
16].
In this study, cut-off values indicative of vascular compromise were determined for flap perfusion monitoring with attached surface probes for the O2C analysis system. Cut-off values indicative of vascular compromise differed between the attached and unattached surface probes, reflecting differences in measurement depth — i.e., 2 mm and 8 mm and 3 mm, respectively — and thus differences in the skin microvasculature depending on the skin layer examined — i.e., the dermis containing the superficial papillary and the deeper reticular plexus and the subcutaneous tissue containing the subcutaneous plexus [
22,
23]. Differences in vessel density and diameter between these plexus formations, for example, are likely to affect blood flow and hemoglobin concentration in terms of the relationship between vessel diameter, resistance, and blood flow [
22‐
24]. In addition, hemoglobin oxygen saturation has been shown to be dependent on blood flow [
7]. When considering the differences in perfusion measurements in this study, it should be noted that in addition to the measurement depth, the measurement area was not identical between the two surface probes [
14,
15]. Furthermore, the influence of the intraoral moist environment on the perfusion measurement, which is likely to be more pronounced with attached probes since they cannot be removed for drying, could not be excluded [
25].
Notably, in line with cut-off values indicative of vascular compromise for unattached probes for flap perfusion monitoring with the O2C analysis system determined in previous studies and used as the reference standards in this study, cut-off values indicative of vascular compromise for attached probes were higher in terms of blood flow and hemoglobin oxygen saturation in RFFF than in ALTF [
7,
9]. The differences with respect to a cut-off value of an increase in hemoglobin concentration greater than 10% for attached surface probes and greater than 30% for unattached surface probes may be related to the tendency for generally higher hemoglobin concentration values with attached surface probes, measuring at a tissue depth of 3 mm, compared with unattached surface probes, measuring at tissue depths of 2 mm and 8 mm [
7,
9].
This study found that flap perfusion monitoring with attached surface probes for the O2C analysis system on the basis of all flap perfusion parameters combined — i.e., blood flow, hemoglobin concentration, and hemoglobin oxygen saturation — yielded a sensitivity of 100.0%, a specificity of 97.1%, and an accuracy of 97.1% in detecting vascular compromise, relative to flap perfusion monitoring with attached surface probes for the O2C analysis system serving as the reference standard method. Interestingly, some measurements with attached surface probes showed hemoglobin oxygen saturation values indicative of vascular compromise, whereas this was not the case with unattached surface probes. This resulted in a specificity of 97.1% for hemoglobin oxygen saturation evaluated separately but also possibly reflects the potential of flap perfusion monitoring with attached surface probes in the earlier detection of vascular compromise. In addition, based on a Cohen’s kappa of 0.653, the study found substantial concordance between flap perfusion monitoring with attached and unattached surface probes [
18]. However, given the low specificity value, the concordance between attached and unattached surface probes for hemoglobin oxygen saturation evaluated separately was only fair, with a Cohen’s kappa of 0.325 [
18].
In general, the study demonstrated that flap perfusion monitoring with attached surface probes for the O2C analysis system was comparable to flap perfusion monitoring with unattached surface probes in terms of technical feasibility and patient safety, as no event of probe detachment or disconnection and no infections or bleeding due to the attachment structures were observed as potential disadvantages of the attached surface probes [
26].
Nevertheless, the study has several limitations, such as the small number of patients in the sample, the limited number of ALTFs included in the study, and the fact that only four flaps in the study had vascular compromise and subsequently underwent flap revision. With regard to the limited number of four flaps that required revision, it should be noted that in microvascular reconstruction of the head and neck region, the number of free flaps that require revision is generally low; the percentage of flaps that required revision in this study, 13.3%, was within the range observed in the literature [
8,
27‐
29]. However, the determination of cut-off values indicative of vascular compromise and the assessment of values such as sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy in terms of the detection of vascular compromise for attached surface probes can only be considered as approximative values and a first orientation in this context. Furthermore, all revised RFFFs showed primarily venous vascular compromise and therefore likely only secondarily altered values for blood flow; in addition, the only revised ALTF showed primarily arterial vascular compromise and therefore likely only secondarily altered values for hemoglobin concentration [
7,
9]. Regarding the limited postoperative monitoring period in this study up to 48 h postoperatively, and the potential occurrence of the requirement for flap revision beyond this period, it should be kept in mind that the risk of vascular compromise in free flaps is highest during the first period of 48 h postoperatively, and the flap salvage rate is lower beyond the period of 48 h postoperatively [
11,
30,
31].
This study evaluated for the first time postoperative flap perfusion monitoring with attached surface probes for the O2C analysis system in terms of detecting vascular compromise in microvascular head and neck reconstruction. The study demonstrated that attached surface probes are technically feasible and represent a safe option for patients to be used with the O2C analysis system for postoperative flap perfusion monitoring. Based on distinctive cut-off values, flap perfusion monitoring with attached surface probes showed high accuracy and, more importantly, a substantial concordance with flap perfusion monitoring with unattached surface probes, supporting interchangeability between the two surface probes. Further studies are needed to confirm the cut-off values indicative of vascular compromise for attached surface probes and to validate their accuracy to maintain the clinical utility of the O2C analysis system for flap perfusion monitoring.
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.