nach oben

Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology

Erschienen in:

19.09.2023 | Refractive Surgery

Impact of the preoperative cylinder on astigmatism correction in femtosecond lenticule extraction (FLEX): a prospective observational study

verfasst von: Xiuyu Mao, Han Chen, Yinzhen Zhao, Shunmei Ji, Jinhui Dai

Erschienen in: Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology | Ausgabe 2/2024

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

To explore the impact of the preoperative manifest cylinder on astigmatism correction via femtosecond lenticule extraction (FLEX), or small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE).

Methods

This was a prospective observational study. Eyes were categorized into mild (n = 88), moderate (n = 46), and severe (n = 53) astigmatism groups, based on the preoperative manifest cylinder. Vector analysis was conducted with the back vertex distance set at 12 mm. The primary outcome was the correction index (CI), with secondary outcomes including the safety, efficacy, predictability, and vectoral alterations related to FLEX.

Results

The average target-induced astigmatism was 0.45 ± 0.20 D, 0.95 ± 0.17 D, and 1.99 ± 0.65 D in the three groups (P < 0.001), and the average CI was 1.12± 0.05, 1.01 ± 0.03, and 0.95 ± 0.02 (P = 0.020), with the severe astigmatism group displaying a notably lower CI. The efficacy, safety, predictability, or stability of FLEX did not demonstrate any significant differences among the three groups. The CIs exhibited a significant difference in eyes with with-the-rule (WTR) astigmatism and against-the-rule (ATR) astigmatism from the mild to severe astigmatism group. In eyes with oblique astigmatism, the average CI exceeded one.

Conclusion

Patients with manifest cylinder exceeding 1.25 D have a heightened risk of under-correction in WTR and ATR astigmatism compared to those with mild astigmatism, and mild over-correction may occur in cases of oblique astigmatism.

Frings A, Richard G, Steinberg J, Skevas C, Druchkiv V, Katz T, Linke SJ (2015) LASIK for spherical refractive myopia: effect of topographic astigmatism (ocular residual astigmatism, ORA) on refractive outcome. PLoS One 10:e0124313. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0124313CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Zhang J, Wu Y, Sharma B, Gupta R, Jawla S, Bullimore MA (2023) Epidemiology and burden of astigmatism: a systematic literature review. Optom Vis Sci 100:218CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Mozayan E, Lee JK (2014) Update on astigmatism management. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 25:286–290. https://doi.org/10.1097/icu.0000000000000068CrossRefPubMed

Sigireddi RR, Weikert MP (2020) How much astigmatism to treat in cataract surgery. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 31:10–14. https://doi.org/10.1097/icu.0000000000000627CrossRefPubMed

Li M, Li M, Chen Y, Miao H, Yang D, Ni K, Zhou X (2019) Five-year results of small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond laser LASIK (FS-LASIK) for myopia. Acta Ophthalmol 97:e373–e380. https://doi.org/10.1111/aos.14017CrossRefPubMed

Chang JSM (2018) Femtosecond laser-assisted astigmatic keratotomy: a review. Eye Vision (Lond, England) 5:6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40662-018-0099-9CrossRef

Han T, Xu Y, Han X, Zeng L, Shang J, Chen X, Zhou X (2019) Three-year outcomes of small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) for myopia and myopic astigmatism. Br J Ophthalmol 103:565–568. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2018-312140CrossRefPubMed

Gauvin M, Wallerstein A (2018) AstigMATIC: an automatic tool for standard astigmatism vector analysis. BMC Ophthalmol 18:255. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-018-0920-1CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Ivarsen A, Hjortdal J (2014) Correction of myopic astigmatism with small incision lenticule extraction. J Refract Surg 30:240–247. https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20140320-02CrossRefPubMed

10.

Watanabe K, Negishi K, Kawai M, Torii H, Kaido M, Tsubota K (2013) Effect of experimentally induced astigmatism on functional, conventional, and low-contrast visual acuity. J Refract Surg 29:19–24. https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20121211-01CrossRefPubMed

11.

Chow SSW, Chow LLW, Lee CZ, Chan TCY (2019) Astigmatism correction using SMILE. Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila) 8:391–396. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.APO.0000580140.74826.f5CrossRefPubMed

12.

Primavera L, Canto-Cerdan M, Alio JL, Alio Del Barrio JL (2022) Influence of age on small incision lenticule extraction outcomes. Br J Ophthalmol 106:341–348. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2020-316865CrossRefPubMed

13.

Sekundo W, Kunert KS, Blum M (2011) Small incision corneal refractive surgery using the small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) procedure for the correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism: results of a 6 month prospective study. Br J Ophthalmol 95:335–339. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.2009.174284CrossRefPubMed

14.

Dubbelman M, Sicam VA, Van der Heijde GL (2006) The shape of the anterior and posterior surface of the aging human cornea. Vis Res 46:993–1001. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2005.09.021CrossRefPubMed

15.

Qian Y, Huang J, Zhou X, Wang Y (2015) Comparison of femtosecond laser small-incision lenticule extraction and laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy to correct myopic astigmatism. J Cataract Refract Surg 41:2476–2486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.05.043CrossRefPubMed

16.

Ivarsen A, Gyldenkerne A, Hjortdal J (2018) Correction of astigmatism with small-incision lenticule extraction: impact of against-the-rule and with-the-rule astigmatism. J Cataract Refract Surg 44:1066–1072. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2018.06.029CrossRefPubMed

17.

Perez-Izquierdo R, Rodriguez-Vallejo M, Matamoros A, Martinez J, Garzon N, Poyales F, Fernandez J (2019) Influence of preoperative astigmatism type and magnitude on the effectiveness of SMILE correction. J Refract Surg 35:40–47. https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20181127-01CrossRefPubMed

18.

Alpins NA (1993) A new method of analyzing vectors for changes in astigmatism. J Cataract Refract Surg 19:524–533. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0886-3350(13)80617-7CrossRefPubMed

19.

Alpins N (2001) Astigmatism analysis by the Alpins method. J Cataract Refract Surg 27:31–49CrossRefPubMed

20.

Zhang J, Wang Y, Wu W, Xu L, Li X, Dou R (2015) Vector analysis of low to moderate astigmatism with small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE): results of a 1-year follow-up. BMC Ophthalmol 15:8. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2415-15-8CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

21.

Khalifa MA, Ghoneim AM, Shaheen MS, Pinero DP (2017) Vector analysis of astigmatic changes after small-incision lenticule extraction and wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg 43:819–824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2017.03.033CrossRefPubMed

22.

Taneri S, Kiessler S, Rost A, Schultz T, Dick HB (2019) Small-incision lenticule extraction for the correction of myopic astigmatism. J Cataract Refract Surg 45:62–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2018.08.030CrossRefPubMed

23.

Dishler JG, Slade S, Seifert S, Schallhorn SC (2020) Small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) for the correction of myopia with astigmatism: outcomes of the United States Food and Drug Administration Premarket Approval clinical trial. Ophthalmology 127:1020–1034. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2020.01.010CrossRefPubMed

24.

Moshirfar M, Thomson AC, West WB Jr, Hall MN, McCabe SE, Thomson RJ, Ronquillo YC, Hoopes PC (2020) Initial single-site experience using SMILE for the treatment of astigmatism in myopic eyes and comparison of astigmatic outcomes with existing literature. Clin Ophthalmol 14:3551–3562. https://doi.org/10.2147/opth.S276899CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

25.

Alpins N (1997) New method of targeting vectors to treat astigmatism. J Cataract Refract Surg 23:65–75CrossRefPubMed

26.

Kunert KS, Russmann C, Blum M, Sluyterman VLG (2013) Vector analysis of myopic astigmatism corrected by femtosecond refractive lenticule extraction. J Cataract Refract Surg 39:759–769. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2012.11.033CrossRefPubMed

27.

Kwak JJ, Jun I, Kim EK, Seo KY, Kim TI (2020) Clinical outcomes of small incision lenticule extraction in myopia: study of vector parameters and corneal aberrations. Korean J Ophthalmol 34:76–84. https://doi.org/10.3341/kjo.2019.0109CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

28.

Sideroudi H, Lazaridis A, Messerschmidt-Roth A, Labiris G, Kozobolis V, Sekundo W (2018) Corneal irregular astigmatism and curvature changes after small incision lenticule extraction: three-year follow-up. Cornea 37:875–880. https://doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0000000000001532CrossRefPubMed

29.

Kamiya K, Shimizu K, Yamagishi M, Igarashi A, Kobashi H (2015) Anterior and posterior corneal astigmatism after refractive lenticule extraction for myopic astigmatism. J Ophthalmol 2015:915853. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/915853CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

30.

Sideroudi H, Sekundo W, Kozobolis V, Messerschmidt-Roth A, Lazaridis A (2019) Fourier analysis of corneal irregular astigmatism after small incision lenticule extraction and comparison to femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis. Cornea 0:1–7

31.

Artal P, Guirao A, Berrio E, Williams DR (2001) Compensation of corneal aberrations by the internal optics in the human eye. J Vis 1:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1167/1.1.1CrossRefPubMed

32.

Chan TCY, Wan KH, Zhang L, Wang Y (2019) Impact of ocular residual astigmatism on predictability of myopic astigmatism correction after small-incision lenticule extraction. J Cataract Refract Surg 45:525–526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2019.01.028CrossRefPubMed

33.

Alpins N, Stamatelatos G (2007) Customized photoastigmatic refractive keratectomy using combined topographic and refractive data for myopia and astigmatism in eyes with forme fruste and mild keratoconus. J Cataract Refract Surg 33:591–602CrossRefPubMed

34.

Arbelaez MC, Alpins N, Verma S, Stamatelatos G, Arbelaez JG, Arba-Mosquera S (2017) Clinical outcomes of laser in situ keratomileusis with an aberration-neutral profile centered on the corneal vertex comparing vector planning with manifest refraction planning for the treatment of myopic astigmatis. J Cataract Refract Surg 43:1504–1514CrossRefPubMed

35.

Chen P, Ye Y, Yu N, Zhang X, He J, Zheng H, Wei H, Zhuang J, Yu K (2019) Comparison of small incision lenticule extraction surgery with and without cyclotorsion error correction for patients with astigmatism. Cornea 38:723–729. https://doi.org/10.1097/ico.0000000000001937CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

36.

Hou X, Du K, Wen D, Hu S, Hu T, Li C, Tang Y, Wu X (2021) Early visual quality outcomes after small-incision lenticule extraction surgery for correcting high myopic astigmatism. BMC Ophthalmol 21:48. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-021-01807-8CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

37.

Ganesh S, Brar S, Pawar A (2017) Results of intraoperative manual cyclotorsion compensation for myopic astigmatism in patients undergoing small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE). J Refract Surg 33:506–512. https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20170328-01CrossRefPubMed

38.

Prickett AL, Bui K, Hallak J, Bakhtiyari P, de la Cruz J, Azar DT, Chamon W (2015) Cyclotorsional and non-cyclotorsional components of eye rotation observed from sitting to supine position. Br J Ophthalmol 99:49–53. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2014-304975CrossRefPubMed

39.

Alpins NA (1997) Vector analysis of astigmatism changes by flattening, steepening, and torque. J Cataract Refract Surg 23:1503–1514. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0886-3350(97)80021-1CrossRefPubMed

40.

Xu J, Liu F, Liu M, Yang X, Weng S, Lin L, Lin H, Xie Y, Liu Q (2019) Effect of cyclotorsion compensation with a novel technique in small incision lenticule extraction surgery for the correction of myopic astigmatism. J Refract Surg 35:301–308. https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20190402-01CrossRefPubMed

Titel: Impact of the preoperative cylinder on astigmatism correction in femtosecond lenticule extraction (FLEX): a prospective observational study
verfasst von: Xiuyu Mao
Han Chen
Yinzhen Zhao
Shunmei Ji
Jinhui Dai
Publikationsdatum: 19.09.2023
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology / Ausgabe 2/2024
Print ISSN: 0721-832X
Elektronische ISSN: 1435-702X
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-023-06211-0

Neu im Fachgebiet Augenheilkunde

Metastase in der periokulären Region

Metastasen Leitthema

Orbitale und periokuläre metastatische Tumoren galten früher als sehr selten. Aber mit der ständigen Aktualisierung von Medikamenten und Nachweismethoden für die Krebsbehandlung werden neue Chemotherapien und Strahlenbehandlungen eingesetzt. Die …

Staging und Systemtherapie bei okulären und periokulären Metastasen

Metastasen Leitthema

Metastasen bösartiger Erkrankungen sind die häufigsten Tumoren, die im Auge diagnostiziert werden. Sie treten bei ungefähr 5–10 % der Patienten mit soliden Tumoren im Verlauf der Erkrankung auf. Besonders häufig sind diese beim Mammakarzinom und …

CME: Wundheilung nach Trabekulektomie

Trabekulektomie CME-Artikel

Wird ein Glaukom chirurgisch behandelt, ist die anschließende Wundheilung von entscheidender Bedeutung. In diesem CME-Kurs lernen Sie, welche Pathomechanismen der Vernarbung zugrunde liegen, wie perioperativ therapiert und Operationsversagen frühzeitig erkannt werden kann.

„standard operating procedures“ (SOP) – Vorschlag zum therapeutischen Management bei periokulären sowie intraokulären Metastasen

Metastasen Leitthema

Peri- sowie intraokuläre Metastasen sind insgesamt gesehen selten und meist Zeichen einer fortgeschrittenen primären Tumorerkrankung. Die Therapie ist daher zumeist palliativ und selten kurativ. Zudem ist die Therapiefindung sehr individuell. Die …

Update Augenheilkunde

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Live-Webinar "Urologie und Sexualmedizin in der Praxis"

Springer Medizin

Impact of the preoperative cylinder on astigmatism correction in femtosecond lenticule extraction (FLEX): a prospective observational study

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Neu im Fachgebiet Augenheilkunde

Metastase in der periokulären Region

Staging und Systemtherapie bei okulären und periokulären Metastasen

CME: Wundheilung nach Trabekulektomie

„standard operating procedures“ (SOP) – Vorschlag zum therapeutischen Management bei periokulären sowie intraokulären Metastasen

Update Augenheilkunde

Live-Webinar "Urologie und Sexualmedizin in der Praxis"

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2024

Effects of grating stimulation on vision in individuals with amblyopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Characteristics of amelanotic iris lesions – a ten-year historical cohort

Nationwide pharmacy-based dry eye disease screening: analysis of cross-sectional data from 8259 individuals

Biomarkers determining treatment interval of diabetic macular edema after initial resolution by anti-vascular endothelial growth factor

Chord mu and chord alpha as postoperative predictors in multifocal intraocular lens implantation

Factors associated with intrachoroidal cavitation and sinkhole formation in eyes with glaucomatous visual-field defects

Neu im Fachgebiet Augenheilkunde

Metastase in der periokulären Region

Staging und Systemtherapie bei okulären und periokulären Metastasen

CME: Wundheilung nach Trabekulektomie

„standard operating procedures“ (SOP) – Vorschlag zum therapeutischen Management bei periokulären sowie intraokulären Metastasen

Update Augenheilkunde