nach oben

Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology

Erschienen in:

15.05.2023 | Review Article

Success rate of external, endonasal, and transcanalicular laser DCR with or without silicone stent intubation for NLD obstruction: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

verfasst von: Cem Evereklioglu, Hidayet Sener, Osman Ahmet Polat, Hatice Kubra Sonmez, Ayse Busra Gunay Sener, Fatih Horozoglu

Erschienen in: Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology | Ausgabe 12/2023

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

To define and compare the effectiveness of external dacryocystorhinostomy (EX-DCR), endonasal (EN-DCR), and transcanalicular laser-assisted (TL-DCR) with or without silicone stent (S) intubation.

Methods

Studies were retrieved from PubMed, Scopus, and WoS. Frequentist and Bayesian network meta-analyses were performed and pooled estimations were expressed as risk ratio (RR). We included all original investigations of prospective, randomized controlled trials comparing success rate for any two of the following six surgical procedures: standard EX-DCR with or without S, cold EN-DCR with or without S, and TL-DCR with or without S. The primary outcome measure was the objective success rate.

Results

Thirty-two studies with 3277 cases were included in the final quantitative analysis. TL-DCR with S was inferior to EN-DCR with S (RR: 1.20; 95% CI: 1.05–1.37), EX-DCR with S (RR: 1.17 95% CI: 1.05–1.29), EN-DCR without S (RR: 1.18; 95% CI: 1.03–1.35), and EX-DCR without S (RR: 1.15; 95%CI: 1.05–1.26) in frequentist statistics. No other statistical difference was found between other surgeries. When we excluded studies with additional interventions (nasal and revision surgery) for sensitivity analysis, 23 studies with 2468 cases were included to analysis. The success rates of TL-DCR with S and EN-DCR without S became similar (RR: 1.14 95% CI: 0.99–1.30) but there was no change in other outcomes. Similar results were found in Bayesian statistics. The surface under the cumulative ranking curve was higher for EN-DCR with S (0.75), whereas it was higher for EX-DCR with S (0.56) after sensitivity analysis.

Conclusion

Between endoscopic and external and transcanalicular laser without S procedures, there is no statistical difference. The rank probability showed that EN-DCR with S was a more appropriate surgical option when patients with nasal disease were included, whereas EX-DCR with S was a more appropriate surgical option when patients with nasal disease were excluded from the analysis.

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Evereklioglu C, Oner A, Somdaş MA et al (2007) Figure-of-eight vertical mattress suture technique for anterior flap suspension to overlying tissues in external dacryocystorhinostomy. Am J Ophthalmol 143(2):328–333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2006.09.057CrossRefPubMed

Evereklioglu C (2020) Primary probing with and without Monoka Silastic Stent Intubation for Epiphora in Older Children and Adults. Curr Eye Res 45(1):87–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/02713683.2019.1643026CrossRefPubMed

Cokkeser Y, Evereklioglu C, Er H (2000) Comparative external versus endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: results in 115 patients (130 eyes). Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 123(4):488–491. https://doi.org/10.1067/mhn.2000.105470CrossRefPubMed

Jawaheer L, MacEwen CJ, Anijeet D (2017) Endonasal versus external dacryocystorhinostomy for nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2(2):Cd007097. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD007097.pub3CrossRefPubMed

Levin PS, StormoGipson DJ (1992) Endocanalicular laser-assisted dacryocystorhinostomy. An anatomic study. Arch Ophthalmol 110(10):1488–1490. https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.1992.01080220150037CrossRefPubMed

Drnovsek-Olup B, Beltram M (2010) Transcanalicular diode laser-assisted dacryocystorhinostomy. Indian J Ophthalmol 58(3):213–217. https://doi.org/10.4103/0301-4738.62646CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Schlachter DM, Richani K, Black EH (2016) Diode laser-assisted endocanalicular dacryocystorhinostomy: a prospective study. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg 32(3):183–186. https://doi.org/10.1097/iop.0000000000000453CrossRefPubMed

Piaton JM, Keller P, Limon S et al (2001) Holmium: YAG and neodymium: YAG laser assisted trans-canalicular dacryocystorhinostomy. Results of 317 first procedures. J Fr Ophtalmol 24(3):253–264PubMed

Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM et al (2021) The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Syst Rev 10(1):89. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01626-4CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

10.

Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ et al (2019) Updated guidance for trusted systematic reviews: a new edition of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 10:Ed000142. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.ed000142

11.

Sterne JAC, Savović J, Page MJ et al (2019) RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ 366:l4898. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l4898CrossRefPubMed

12.

Nikolakopoulou A, Higgins JPT, Papakonstantinou T et al (2020) CINeMA: an approach for assessing confidence in the results of a network meta-analysis. PLoS Med 17(4):e1003082. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1003082CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

13.

Owen RK, Bradbury N, Xin Y et al (2019) MetaInsight: an interactive web-based tool for analyzing, interrogating, and visualizing network meta-analyses using R-shiny and netmeta. Res Synth Methods 10(4):569–581. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1373CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

14.

Elmorsy S, Fayek HM (2010) Rubber tube versus silicone tube at the osteotomy site in external dacryocystorhinostomy. Orbit 29(2):76–82. https://doi.org/10.3109/01676830903294891CrossRefPubMed

15.

Afzal MM, Mehmood A, Maqbool R et al (2014) 53-55 to compare the success rate of external dacryocystorhinostomy with and without silicon intubation in patients of nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Pak J Med Health Sci 8(1):53–55

16.

Rather S, Singh T (2013) External dacryocystorhinostomy with & without silicon tube intubation in chronic dacryocystitis with nasolacrimal duct block. JK Sci 15(1):24

17.

Zaman M, Babar TF, Abdullah A (2005) Prospective randomized comparison of dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) with and without intubation. Pak J Med Res 44(2):75–78

18.

Massoud OM, Elbakary MA, Shalaby OE et al (2020) Evaluation of the role of silicone intubation in non-complicated external dacryocystorhinostomy. Open Ophthalmol J 14(1)

19.

Sadaka AAA, Alamin AM, Gad NNM (2021) A comparative study of external dacryocystorhinostomy with stent versus no stent in acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Egypt J Hosp Med 82(2):270–275. https://doi.org/10.21608/EJHM.2021.143888CrossRef

20.

Saiju R, Morse LJ, Weinberg D et al (2009) Prospective randomised comparison of external dacryocystorhinostomy with and without silicone intubation. Br J Ophthalmol 93(9):1220–1222. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.2008.147819CrossRefPubMed

21.

Chavan SS, Kale VD, Rao KN et al (2018) Comparison of application of mitomycin C Vs silicon stenting Vs conventional method in endonasal dacrocystorhinostomy: a randomized controlled trial of 150 patients. Iran J Otorhinolaryngol 30(96):11–18PubMedPubMedCentral

22.

Reddy YJ, Reddy YM, Kiran M et al (2015) A comparative study of outcomes of dacryocystorhinostomy with and without silicone stenting. IOSR J Dent Med Sci 14(7):82–85

23.

Rao SVM, Rajshekar MM (2016) Dacryocystorhinostomy stent insertion in initial endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy. Clin Rhinol An Int J 9(3):120–124. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10013-1284CrossRef

24.

Shashidhar K, Nagalotimath U, Dixit D (2014) Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy with and without silicone stenting: a comparative study. Al Ameen J Med Sci 3:0

25.

Fayers T, Dolman PJ (2016) Bicanalicular silicone stents in endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy: results of a randomized clinical trial. Ophthalmology 123(10):2255–2259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.06.026CrossRefPubMed

26.

Al-Qahtani AS (2012) Primary endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy with or without silicone tubing: a prospective randomized study. Am J Rhinol Allergy 26(4):332–334. https://doi.org/10.2500/ajra.2012.26.3789CrossRefPubMed

27.

Raghav MG, Naga R, Raghavan D (2018) A comparative study of the results of endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy with and without stent placement. J Marine Med Soc 20(2):135CrossRef

28.

Nitin T, Uddin S, Paul G (2022) Endonasal endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy with and without stents-a comparative study. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 74(Suppl 2):1433–1441. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-021-02561-5CrossRefPubMed

29.

Harugop AS, Mudhol RS, Rekha BK et al (2008) Endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy: a prospective study. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 60(4):335–340. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-008-0112-zCrossRefPubMed

30.

Khatri MS, Kharaya A (2022) Clinical trial to compare success rate of endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy and external dacryocystorhinostomy for treatment of primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 74(Suppl 2):1266–1273. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-020-02352-4CrossRefPubMed

31.

Chong KK, Lai FH, Ho M et al (2013) Randomized trial on silicone intubation in endoscopic mechanical dacryocystorhinostomy (SEND) for primary nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Ophthalmology 120(10):2139–2145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.02.036CrossRefPubMed

32.

Yu B, Xia Y, Sun JY et al (2021) Surgical outcomes in acute dacryocystitis patients undergoing endonasal endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy with or without silicone tube intubation. Int J Ophthalmol 14(6):844–848. https://doi.org/10.18240/ijo.2021.06.08CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

33.

Çetin YS, Akın R, Düzenli U et al (2022) Effect of silver nitrate application on the success of endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy. Am J Rhinol Allergy 36(2):216–221. https://doi.org/10.1177/19458924211042786CrossRefPubMed

34.

Smitha S, Jagannath B (2016) Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy with and without silicone stent: a comparative study. J Med Sci Clin Res 4(9):12861–12864

35.

Unlu HH, Gunhan K, Baser EF et al (2009) Long-term results in endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: is intubation really required? Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 140(4):589–595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otohns.2008.12.056CrossRefPubMed

36.

Cavaliere M, De Luca P, Scarpa A et al (2022) Longitudinal randomized study to evaluate the long-term outcome of endoscopic primary dacryocystorhinostomy with or without silicone tube. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 279(2):1105–1109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-021-07104-wCrossRefPubMed

37.

Monga J, Sharma Y, Mishra G et al (2019) Resolving perplexity: comparison of endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy with and without stent. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 71(Suppl 3):1843–1848. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-017-1241-zCrossRefPubMed

38.

Smirnov G, Tuomilehto H, Teräsvirta M et al (2008) Silicone tubing is not necessary after primary endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: a prospective randomized study. Am J Rhinol 22(2):214–217. https://doi.org/10.2500/ajr.2008.22.3132CrossRefPubMed

39.

Nailwal S, Ram A, Mehrotra N et al (2015) Comparison of external and endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy in acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction. J Evol Med Dent Sci 4(14):2283–2294CrossRef

40.

Moras K, Bhat M, Shreyas C et al (2011) External dacryocystorhinostomy versus endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: a comparison. J Clin Diagn Res 5(2):182–186

41.

Bhandary SA, Reddy E, Shetty SB et al (2015) Prospective randomised comparative study of external dacryocystorhinostomy and endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy. J Evol Med Dent Sci 4(58):10187–10206CrossRef

42.

Wu W, Yan W, MacCallum JK et al (2009) Primary treatment of acute dacryocystitis by endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy with silicone intubation guided by a soft probe. Ophthalmology 116(1):116–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.09.041CrossRefPubMed

43.

Hartikainen J, Antila J, Varpula M et al (1998) Prospective randomized comparison of endonasal endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy and external dacryocystorhinostomy. Laryngoscope 108(12):1861–1866. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005537-199812000-00018CrossRefPubMed

44.

Goel R, Nagpal S, Kumar S et al (2017) Transcanalicular laser-assisted dacryocystorhinostomy with endonasal augmentation in primary nasolacrimal duct obstruction: our experience. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg 33(6):408–412. https://doi.org/10.1097/iop.0000000000000802CrossRefPubMed

45.

Mourya D, Rijal RK (2017) Transcanalicular laser-assisted dacryocystorhinostomy with diode laser. Orbit 36(6):370–374. https://doi.org/10.1080/01676830.2017.1337189CrossRefPubMed

46.

Marcet MM, Kuk AK, Phelps PO (2014) Evidence-based review of surgical practices in endoscopic endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy for primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction and other new indications. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 25(5):443–448. https://doi.org/10.1097/icu.0000000000000084CrossRefPubMed

47.

Woog JJ, Kennedy RH, Custer PL et al (2001) Endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Ophthalmology 108(12):2369–2377. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0161-6420(01)00945-9CrossRefPubMed

48.

Narioka J, Ohashi Y (2008) Transcanalicular-endonasal semiconductor diode laser-assisted revision surgery for failed external dacryocystorhinostomy. Am J Ophthalmol 146(1):60–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2008.02.028CrossRefPubMed

49.

Orsolini MJ, Schellini SA, Souza Meneguim RLF et al (2020) Success of endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy with or without stents: systematic review and meta-analysis. Orbit 39(4):258–265. https://doi.org/10.1080/01676830.2019.1677726CrossRefPubMed

50.

Ing EB, Bedi H, Hussain A et al (2018) Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in dacryocystorhinostomy with and without silicone intubation. Can J Ophthalmol 53(5):466–470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjo.2017.12.006CrossRefPubMed

51.

Xie C, Zhang L, Liu Y et al (2017) Comparing the success rate of dacryocystorhinostomy with and without silicone intubation: a trial sequential analysis of randomized control Trials. Sci Rep 7(1):1936. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-02070-yCrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

52.

Kim DH, Kim SI, Jin HJ et al (2018) The clinical efficacy of silicone stents for endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: a meta-analysis. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol 11(3):151–157. https://doi.org/10.21053/ceo.2017.01781CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

53.

Kang MG, Shim WS, Shin DK et al (2018) A systematic review of benefit of silicone intubation in endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol 11(2):81–88. https://doi.org/10.21053/ceo.2018.00031CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

54.

Sarode D, Bari DA, Cain AC et al (2017) The benefit of silicone stents in primary endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Otolaryngol 42(2):307–314. https://doi.org/10.1111/coa.12751CrossRefPubMed

55.

Unlu HH, Toprak B, Aslan A et al (2002) Comparison of surgical outcomes in primary endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy with and without silicone intubation. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 111(8):704–709. https://doi.org/10.1177/000348940211100809CrossRefPubMed

56.

Saeed BM (2012) Endoscopic DCR without stents: clinical guidelines and procedure. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 269(2):545–549. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-011-1727-3CrossRefPubMed

57.

Shapira Y, Macri C, Usmani E et al (2022) Outcomes of intubation and endoscopic DCR in functional nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Rhinology 60(4):308–312. https://doi.org/10.4193/Rhin22.047CrossRefPubMed

58.

Evereklioglu C, Horozoglu F, Polat OA et al (2023) Modified external revision-DCR in previous failed endonasal, transcanalicular or external-DCR: technical strategy and teaching pearls for success. Rom J Ophthalmol 67(1):14. https://doi.org/10.22336/rjo.2023.4

Titel: Success rate of external, endonasal, and transcanalicular laser DCR with or without silicone stent intubation for NLD obstruction: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
verfasst von: Cem Evereklioglu
Hidayet Sener
Osman Ahmet Polat
Hatice Kubra Sonmez
Ayse Busra Gunay Sener
Fatih Horozoglu
Publikationsdatum: 15.05.2023
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology / Ausgabe 12/2023
Print ISSN: 0721-832X
Elektronische ISSN: 1435-702X
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-023-06089-y

Neu im Fachgebiet Augenheilkunde

Metastase in der periokulären Region

Metastasen Leitthema

Orbitale und periokuläre metastatische Tumoren galten früher als sehr selten. Aber mit der ständigen Aktualisierung von Medikamenten und Nachweismethoden für die Krebsbehandlung werden neue Chemotherapien und Strahlenbehandlungen eingesetzt. Die …

Staging und Systemtherapie bei okulären und periokulären Metastasen

Metastasen Leitthema

Metastasen bösartiger Erkrankungen sind die häufigsten Tumoren, die im Auge diagnostiziert werden. Sie treten bei ungefähr 5–10 % der Patienten mit soliden Tumoren im Verlauf der Erkrankung auf. Besonders häufig sind diese beim Mammakarzinom und …

CME: Wundheilung nach Trabekulektomie

Trabekulektomie CME-Artikel

Wird ein Glaukom chirurgisch behandelt, ist die anschließende Wundheilung von entscheidender Bedeutung. In diesem CME-Kurs lernen Sie, welche Pathomechanismen der Vernarbung zugrunde liegen, wie perioperativ therapiert und Operationsversagen frühzeitig erkannt werden kann.

„standard operating procedures“ (SOP) – Vorschlag zum therapeutischen Management bei periokulären sowie intraokulären Metastasen

Metastasen Leitthema

Peri- sowie intraokuläre Metastasen sind insgesamt gesehen selten und meist Zeichen einer fortgeschrittenen primären Tumorerkrankung. Die Therapie ist daher zumeist palliativ und selten kurativ. Zudem ist die Therapiefindung sehr individuell. Die …

Update Augenheilkunde

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Live-Webinar "Urologie und Sexualmedizin in der Praxis"

Springer Medizin

Success rate of external, endonasal, and transcanalicular laser DCR with or without silicone stent intubation for NLD obstruction: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Neu im Fachgebiet Augenheilkunde

Metastase in der periokulären Region

Staging und Systemtherapie bei okulären und periokulären Metastasen

CME: Wundheilung nach Trabekulektomie

„standard operating procedures“ (SOP) – Vorschlag zum therapeutischen Management bei periokulären sowie intraokulären Metastasen

Update Augenheilkunde

Live-Webinar "Urologie und Sexualmedizin in der Praxis"

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 12/2023

Internal limiting membrane flap with viscoelastic device for lamellar hole surgery with no postoperative positioning

Peripheral and central retinal vascular changes in asymptomatic family members of patients with familial exudative vitreoretinopathy

The epidemiology of basketball-associated eye injuries in the United States, 2012–2021

Comparison of the retinal microvasculature between compressive and glaucomatous optic neuropathy

Iris color as a predictive factor for intraoperative floppy iris syndrome

Evolution of macular atrophy in eyes with neovascular age-related macular degeneration compared to fellow non-neovascular eyes

Neu im Fachgebiet Augenheilkunde

Metastase in der periokulären Region

Staging und Systemtherapie bei okulären und periokulären Metastasen

CME: Wundheilung nach Trabekulektomie

„standard operating procedures“ (SOP) – Vorschlag zum therapeutischen Management bei periokulären sowie intraokulären Metastasen

Update Augenheilkunde