Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery 3/2023

29.03.2023 | Original Article

Surgical Outcomes of Endoscopic Versus Conventional Septoplasty

verfasst von: Heemani Bhardwaj, Gopika Kalsotra, Parmod Kalsotra, Padam Singh, Aditiya Saraf

Erschienen in: Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery | Ausgabe 3/2023

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

The most common cause of nasal obstruction is a deviated nasal septum. It causes breathing difficulties and may eventually also cause sinusitis, epistaxis, sleep disturbances and snoring. The traditional surgeries of the nasal septum improve the nasal airway but do not fulfil the essential criteria in most instances. Endoscopic septoplasty is a fast-developing concept and gaining popularity as it provides a direct targeted approach to the septal anatomic deformity allowing a minimally invasive procedure under excellent visualization. The aim of this study is to compare the post-operative morbidity among conventional and endoscopic septoplasty. The present prospective study was conducted on 50 patients having deviated nasal septum. Patients were randomly divided into two groups of 25 each. Out of 50 patients, in 25 patients (Group A) Conventional septoplasty was done, whereas in other 25 patients (Group B) endoscopic septoplasty was done. The patients were followed up post-operatively at 2 weeks, 4 weeks and 8 weeks. Study Design: comparative study. The mean of operating time (min) in Group A was 60.47 ± 8.16 which was significantly higher as compared to Group B (39.7 ± 6.73). (p value < .0001). The Mean of blood loss (mL) was significantly higher in Group A (88.67 ± 8.77) as compared to Group B. (54.6 ± 7.18). (p value < .0001). Post-operative NOSE score at one month was 7.33 ± 1.5 in group A which was significantly higher as compared to Group B (5 ± 1.41). (p value = 0.0007) whereas post-operative NOSE score at 3 months in Group A was 6.53 ± 1.25 which was significantly higher as compared to Group B (4.4 ± 1.78). Proportion of post-operative complications was comparable in Group A and Group B (No complication 80% vs. 92% respectively). According to the present study, both the conventional and endoscopic septoplasty procedures were effective in relieving nasal obstruction in the patients. Endoscopic septoplasty showed significantly better result than conventional septoplasty in terms of time taken for surgery, blood loss during the surgery, post-operative complications and in terms of quality of life as assessed by NOSE Score.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Pannu KK, Chadha S, Kaur IP (2009) Evaluation of benefits of nacsal septal surgery on nasal symptoms and general health. Indian J Otolaryngol Head and Neck Surg 61(1):59–65CrossRef Pannu KK, Chadha S, Kaur IP (2009) Evaluation of benefits of nacsal septal surgery on nasal symptoms and general health. Indian J Otolaryngol Head and Neck Surg 61(1):59–65CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Dinis PB, Haider H (2002) Septoplasty-long term evaluation of results. Am J Otolaryngol 23(2):85–90CrossRefPubMed Dinis PB, Haider H (2002) Septoplasty-long term evaluation of results. Am J Otolaryngol 23(2):85–90CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Gupta N (2005) Endoscopic septoplasty. Ind J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 57:240–243CrossRef Gupta N (2005) Endoscopic septoplasty. Ind J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 57:240–243CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Gulati SP, Wadhera R, Ahuja N, Garg A, Ghai A (2009) Comparative evaluation of endoscopic with conventional septoplasty. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 61:27–29CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Gulati SP, Wadhera R, Ahuja N, Garg A, Ghai A (2009) Comparative evaluation of endoscopic with conventional septoplasty. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 61:27–29CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Doomra S, Singh M, Singh B, Kaushal A (2019) Evaluating surgical outcomes of conventional versus endoscopic septoplasty using subjective and objective methods. Niger J Clin Pract 22:1372–1377CrossRefPubMed Doomra S, Singh M, Singh B, Kaushal A (2019) Evaluating surgical outcomes of conventional versus endoscopic septoplasty using subjective and objective methods. Niger J Clin Pract 22:1372–1377CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Stewart MG, Witsell DL, Smith TL, Weaver EM, Yueh B, Hannley MT (2004) Development and validation of the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) scale. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 130(2):157–163CrossRefPubMed Stewart MG, Witsell DL, Smith TL, Weaver EM, Yueh B, Hannley MT (2004) Development and validation of the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) scale. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 130(2):157–163CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Singh A, Bhat N, Bhandarkar P, Singh R (2018) A comparative study of conventional versus endoscopic septoplasty. Bengal J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 26(1):1–9CrossRef Singh A, Bhat N, Bhandarkar P, Singh R (2018) A comparative study of conventional versus endoscopic septoplasty. Bengal J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 26(1):1–9CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Metzenbaum M (1929) Replacement of the lower end of the dislocated septal cartilage versus sub-mucus resection of the dislocated end of the septal cartilage. Arch otolaryngol 9(3):282–296CrossRef Metzenbaum M (1929) Replacement of the lower end of the dislocated septal cartilage versus sub-mucus resection of the dislocated end of the septal cartilage. Arch otolaryngol 9(3):282–296CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Galloway T. (1946) The nasal septum. In: Mackay I (ed), Scott-Brown’s Otolaryngology, 6th edn, Buttterworth-Heinemann International edition, p 4/11/1/27 Galloway T. (1946) The nasal septum. In: Mackay I (ed), Scott-Brown’s Otolaryngology, 6th edn, Buttterworth-Heinemann International edition, p 4/11/1/27
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Cottle M, Fisher G, Gaynor I, Loring R (1958) The maxilla-premaxilla approach to extensive nasal septum surgery. Arch Otolaryngol 68:301CrossRef Cottle M, Fisher G, Gaynor I, Loring R (1958) The maxilla-premaxilla approach to extensive nasal septum surgery. Arch Otolaryngol 68:301CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Lanza DC, Rosin DF, Kennedy DW (1993) Endoscopic septal spur resection. Am J Rhinol 7(5):213–216CrossRef Lanza DC, Rosin DF, Kennedy DW (1993) Endoscopic septal spur resection. Am J Rhinol 7(5):213–216CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Stammberger H (1991) Functional endoscopic sinus surgery. The Messerklinger Technique, Decker BC., Philadelphia, pp 430–434 Stammberger H (1991) Functional endoscopic sinus surgery. The Messerklinger Technique, Decker BC., Philadelphia, pp 430–434
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Bajwa F, Ilyas M, Iftilhar M, Aamer MI (2018) A comparative study of Endoscopic Septoplasty versus Conventional Septoplasty. Pak Postgrad Med J 29(2):70–74CrossRef Bajwa F, Ilyas M, Iftilhar M, Aamer MI (2018) A comparative study of Endoscopic Septoplasty versus Conventional Septoplasty. Pak Postgrad Med J 29(2):70–74CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Jain L, Jain M, Chauha AN (2011) Conventional septoplasty versus endoscopic septoplasty. Peoples J Sci Res 4(2):24–28 Jain L, Jain M, Chauha AN (2011) Conventional septoplasty versus endoscopic septoplasty. Peoples J Sci Res 4(2):24–28
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Rao JJ, Kumar ECV, Babu KR, Chowdary VS, Singh J, Rangamani SV (2005) Classification of nasal septal deviation relation to sinonasal pathology. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 57(3):199–201CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Rao JJ, Kumar ECV, Babu KR, Chowdary VS, Singh J, Rangamani SV (2005) Classification of nasal septal deviation relation to sinonasal pathology. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 57(3):199–201CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Sathyaki DC, Geetha C, Munishwara GB, Mohan M, Manjuanth K (2014) A comparative study of endoscopic septoplasty versus conventional septoplasty. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 66(2):155–161CrossRefPubMed Sathyaki DC, Geetha C, Munishwara GB, Mohan M, Manjuanth K (2014) A comparative study of endoscopic septoplasty versus conventional septoplasty. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 66(2):155–161CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Suraneni VR, Kudamala S, Srikanth K (2018) Conventional vs endoscopic septoplasty: our experience. Int J Oper Res Head Surg 4:403–408 Suraneni VR, Kudamala S, Srikanth K (2018) Conventional vs endoscopic septoplasty: our experience. Int J Oper Res Head Surg 4:403–408
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Mandal S, Jana S (2020) A comparative study of endoscopic and conventional septoplasty. Int J Med Res Rev 8(1):1–6CrossRef Mandal S, Jana S (2020) A comparative study of endoscopic and conventional septoplasty. Int J Med Res Rev 8(1):1–6CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Giles WC, Gross CW, Abram AC, Greene WM, Avner TG (1994) Endoscopic septoplasty. Laryngoscope 104(12):1507–1509CrossRefPubMed Giles WC, Gross CW, Abram AC, Greene WM, Avner TG (1994) Endoscopic septoplasty. Laryngoscope 104(12):1507–1509CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Guindi SS, Mostafa HS, Fawzy TO (2016) Endoscopic-assisted septoplasty versus traditional septoplasty: assessment by the NOSE scale. Egypt J Otolaryngol 32:26–31CrossRef Guindi SS, Mostafa HS, Fawzy TO (2016) Endoscopic-assisted septoplasty versus traditional septoplasty: assessment by the NOSE scale. Egypt J Otolaryngol 32:26–31CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Paradis JRB (2011) Open versus endoscopic septoplasty: a single-blinded, Randomized, controlled trial. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 40(1):28–33 Paradis JRB (2011) Open versus endoscopic septoplasty: a single-blinded, Randomized, controlled trial. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 40(1):28–33
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Bothra R, Mathur NN (2009) Comparative evaluation of conventional versus endoscopic septoplasty for limited septal deviation and spur. J Laryngol Otol 123:737–741CrossRefPubMed Bothra R, Mathur NN (2009) Comparative evaluation of conventional versus endoscopic septoplasty for limited septal deviation and spur. J Laryngol Otol 123:737–741CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Surgical Outcomes of Endoscopic Versus Conventional Septoplasty
verfasst von
Heemani Bhardwaj
Gopika Kalsotra
Parmod Kalsotra
Padam Singh
Aditiya Saraf
Publikationsdatum
29.03.2023
Verlag
Springer India
Erschienen in
Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery / Ausgabe 3/2023
Print ISSN: 2231-3796
Elektronische ISSN: 0973-7707
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-023-03720-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2023

Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery 3/2023 Zur Ausgabe

Erhebliches Risiko für Kehlkopfkrebs bei mäßiger Dysplasie

29.05.2024 Larynxkarzinom Nachrichten

Fast ein Viertel der Personen mit mäßig dysplastischen Stimmlippenläsionen entwickelt einen Kehlkopftumor. Solche Personen benötigen daher eine besonders enge ärztliche Überwachung.

Hörschwäche erhöht Demenzrisiko unabhängig von Beta-Amyloid

29.05.2024 Hörstörungen Nachrichten

Hört jemand im Alter schlecht, nimmt das Hirn- und Hippocampusvolumen besonders schnell ab, was auch mit einem beschleunigten kognitiven Abbau einhergeht. Und diese Prozesse scheinen sich unabhängig von der Amyloidablagerung zu ereignen.

„Übersichtlicher Wegweiser“: Lauterbachs umstrittener Klinik-Atlas ist online

17.05.2024 Klinik aktuell Nachrichten

Sie sei „ethisch geboten“, meint Gesundheitsminister Karl Lauterbach: mehr Transparenz über die Qualität von Klinikbehandlungen. Um sie abzubilden, lässt er gegen den Widerstand vieler Länder einen virtuellen Klinik-Atlas freischalten.

Betalaktam-Allergie: praxisnahes Vorgehen beim Delabeling

16.05.2024 Pädiatrische Allergologie Nachrichten

Die große Mehrheit der vermeintlichen Penicillinallergien sind keine. Da das „Etikett“ Betalaktam-Allergie oft schon in der Kindheit erworben wird, kann ein frühzeitiges Delabeling lebenslange Vorteile bringen. Ein Team von Pädiaterinnen und Pädiatern aus Kanada stellt vor, wie sie dabei vorgehen.

Update HNO

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.