Clinical outcome following conservative treatment of 58 mandibular ameloblastoma patients: a retrospective study

The aim of this study was to retrospectively analyze the surgical outcome of the patients with mandibular ameloblastoma (MA) with intact inferior cortex and the lingual cortex of the mandible, treated with conservative management in the form of enucleation with peripheral ostectomy, mechanical curettage, chemical cauterization, dredging, and marsupialization. The patients were included with the diagnosis of MA between the age group of 14 to 60 years with their computed tomography (CT) scans showing intact inferior cortex and the lingual cortex of the mandibular walls. Out of 96 cases of ameloblastoma, 58 (61%) were in mandible and 38 (39%) cases in maxilla. We analyzed these 58 patients retrospectively which were operated conservatively between January 2009 and December 2018. The treatment protocol for all the solid variants and the unicystic variants with intact buccal, inferior, and the lingual cortex was enucleation with peripheral ostectomy followed by mechanical curettage, chemical cauterization, and subsequent dredging. This was performed in 90% (n = 52) cases, whereas the treatment protocol for unicystic variants with perforated buccal cortex and intact inferior and lingual cortex was marsupialization followed by the enucleation with peripheral ostectomy, mechanical curettage, chemical cauterization, and subsequent dredging which was performed in 10% (n = 6) cases. Chi square test was applied to the effectiveness of conservative management as outcome variable. The new bone formation along with bony trabeculae was found in 96.6% (n = 56) of the cases. Recurrence was noted in 3.44% (n = 2) of the cases. A p value was 0.001, thus suggesting statistically highly significant result. On the basis of present study, though we can conclude that the MA with the intact inferior and the lingual cortex can be managed effectively with conservative treatment with long term regular follow up, still we would caution that the reader must use their best clinical judgement based on latest available data. For some patients, returning to clinic frequently and undergoing multiple minor procedures may not be suitable to be considered the best, whereas resection and reconstruction may be deemed more appropriate.